Mark Lerner – Battling Biometrics – http://blip.tv/file/4067555

http://RealityReport.TV

Chris Broughton: Obama Rally Gunman- http://blip.tv/file/4042121

by Justin Kapacinskas

The “illegal” immigration debate, especially over Arizona’s SB1070, is a contentious and emotional one. Many people are rightfully concerned that an extra-constitutional “North American Union” — in which our country’s “sovereignty” is compromised — is taking form, while the living standard of Americans in general falls to a third-world threshold. It is a widely held, albeit misguided belief that this is largely because of a perceived mass-influx of undocumented and largely unskilled and under-educated Mexican immigrants into the territory of the continental United State [sic]. However, the facts do not necessarily bear this out.

Here’s the thing: If you haven’t noticed, the “Federal” government ruling us is already a kleptocratic, unitary thug-state like its bailout-buddy, the government ruling Mexico. No “illegals” were required to cross the border for the supra-national government ruling us to “bailout” the Mexican peso in 1994. The corporate-managed communist regime ostensibly headquartered in Washington, D.C. didn’t need any “illegals”  to enable its costly, immoral, counterproductive, and unconstitutional “war on drugs” south of the border.

Hmmm, now how could the government ruling us just shell out billions in dinero to the corrupt Mexican government? Oh yea, through the IMF, the International Bank of Settlements, and the prime enabler of corrupt, lawless, Big Government politicians in Washington, DC — the Federal Reserve.

The Federal Reserve System: not staffed by "illegals"

You’ll please note that the Fed fiat-money-sovereign is not ostensibly run by “illegals”, the punitive-populist term used for human beings with God-given, unalienable Rights (such as the presumption of innocence) who are “undocumented” by the government ruling us (read: not bearing an indexed tax-slave ID). Although English isn’t the “official language” spoken at the 12 regional branches of the Federal Reserve; inflation (also known as “theft”) is. Are you listening?

Many, if not most of the actions undertaken on our behalf by the central planners at the Federal Reserve are undocumented — that is, not published for consumption by hapless tax-victims — and secretively carried out behind closed doors, such as transfer payments to undisclosed corporations and banks — in the form of perhaps more than $23.7 trillion in taxpayer-subsidized “loans” and bailouts — and, of course, its undisclosed agreements with FOREIGN governments and FOREIGN central banks.

If you haven’t figured it out, the “illegals” cannot and will not impose a welfare state, a nanny state,  a police state, a surveillance state, a warfare state, and a worldwide empire. Only the bloated and grotesque government ruling us can manage to do all of those things.

For the cost of one MP3 download you can make a difference in the life of a patriot in need.

Also, check out:

ACTION UPDATE: Waking up 600,000 Americans- http://blip.tv/file/3906161

ACTION ALERT: Time To Go On The Offensive- http://blip.tv/file/3882575

“The cargo finally being processed for delivery this week consists of supplies prevented by Israel from entering Gaza for the last three years. On the MV Rachel Corrie, the cargo ship of the Free Gaza Movement, we were carrying 20 tons of paper, plus pens & books for schools & universities, over 50 tons of medical supplies & 550 tons of cement for Al Shifa Hospital.  Instead of docking in Gaza & distributing the supplies to the intended recipients, Israel impounded cargo, searched, then handed over to an overburdened UN, who can give no guarantees that it will get to the intended schools or NGO’s.”  said Niamh Moloughney, coordinator of the Free Gaza Movement – Ireland.

The Rebuilding Alliance, one of the U.S. organizations to place humanitarian cargo on the Rachel Corrie is none-the-less hopeful that the backpacks, sports equipment, and building materials donated by hundreds of Americans will be delivered to the designated Gaza non-governmental organizations (NGO’s).

“When we first learned of the Freedom Flotilla, we asked our partner NGO’s in Gaza what we could send that would matter most to them, given the 3 year-long blockade,” said Donna Baranski-Walker, Executive Director of the Rebuidling Alliance, a San Mateo CA-based nonprofit. “They asked Americans to send messages to children, along with backpacks, sports equipment, and cement to build a kindergarten.”

Added Ms. Moloughney, “Israel has insisted that cargo be brought into Ashdod for delivery, but this ignores the overall illegitimacy of Israel’s closure policy. It also means that once more Israel profits from its illegal acts.  The ‘easing’ of the blockade means nothing to families whose homes and businesses are still in ruins and allows them only to be consumers of Israeli goods.”

The Free Gaza Movement repeats that only a complete end to Israel’s punitive closure policy will suffice in starting to repair the economy of this decimated slice of the Mediterranean, the only territory in the world that does not have access to its own sea.

“We ask people throughout the world to press their governments to open Gaza, not just for aid but for movement and trade as well, to truly end the collective punishment of Gaza’s civilian population,” said Huwaida Arraf, chair of the Free Gaza Movement. “That’s why we will continue to send ships to Gaza loaded with civilian supplies Israel refuses to allow into Gaza – and on return, fill our ships with goods from Gaza for export.  We look forward to international cooperation in developing a sea route certification system to assure aid, fair trade and the safety of all.”

Israel continues to hold all of the vessels that it illegally commandeered, including the seven ships of the Freedom Flotilla, as well as the Spirit of Humanity, which Israel hijacked in June 2009.

Prison Planet

The Wikileaks revelations about murderous collusion between Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency and the Afghan Taliban have underlined the central role that country plays in the sponsorship of terrorism. This is despite the US disbursing $1 billion a year to enable the Pakistanis to fight it. In this respect, it would seem that enemies like Iran or Syria are a secondary problem.

Let’s not forget, too, that Pakistani weddings seem to be the preferred excuse for British jihadists – as well as for the likes of would-be Times Square bomber Faisal Shahzad – to visit the many terrorist training camps there.

Although Pakistani collusion with terrorists is a deplorable fact of life for Western forces fighting the Afghan Taliban, we have a simultaneous dependence on Pakistan’s tacit collusion in aerial drone strikes on al-Qaeda and Taliban leaders. This has ensured that it was David Cameron, speaking in Bangalore on his trip to India, who criticised Pakistan’s “export of terror”, rather than Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton. He was right to do so.

Pakistan is the world’s most dangerous source of international terrorism, responsible for 70 per cent of conspiracies to bring murder and mayhem to Britain, not forgetting serial atrocities perpetrated in India. Whereas Saudi Arabia has finally got a grip on its indigenous jihadists (after blithely allowing them to slaughter people elsewhere), Pakistan’s weak democracy and powerful military – within which the ISI nestles like a parasite – seem powerless to grip a problem which threatens not only its neighbours, but through a large diaspora, Western domestic security, too.

The conventional wisdom is that this problem only dates back to the 1980s, when the ISI was co‑opted into a broader Western (and Saudi) campaign to encourage Islamic resistance against the atheist Soviets in Afghanistan. That idea enables many Leftists to spout cheap theories that the CIA was responsible for creating al‑Qaeda, a movement whose origins in fact lie in the domestic politics of Egypt and Saudi Arabia. Others, such as the Indian journalist Sadand Dhume, argue that the problem stems from Pakistan having Islam inscribed in its identity, from the green crescent flag to former prime minister Zulfikar Bhutto’s advertisement of “an Islamic Bomb”. Pan-Islamism is in the country’s DNA, they argue, in ways that are simply not true of other Muslim states such as Indonesia, Morocco, Tunisia or Turkey. Without Islam, the self-styled “Land of the Pure” is an unjustifiable congeries of regions cobbled from the wreckage Mountbatten left in British India.

Whatever the truth, Pakistan is host to a bewildering array of terrorist movements. They include Baluchi and Punjabi separatists, Kashmiri irredentists (who would like to annex Indian Kashmir); the Afghan Taliban, whose leadership around Mullah Omar is believed to be in Quetta; remnant al-Qaeda, presumed to be in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas; and the Pakistani Taliban, whose intention is to convert Pakistan into a strictly Islamist state.

The Pakistani state has consistently indulged those groups which ostensibly conform to its strategic interests, notably in Afghanistan and Kashmir. The familiar excuse is that these are “freedom fighters” rather than terrorists. That is why although Lashkar-e-Taiba is widely known to have been responsible for the atrocity in Mumbai, it continues to operate inside Pakistan, allegedly as a religious charitable organisation, while sundry terrorists have either escaped from custody or dodged the executioner after being convicted. The perceived closeness to India of the Karzai regime in Kabul explains the favour Pakistan shows towards the Afghan Taliban. This is partly a reflection of Pashtun solidarity, but also of a longer-term aim of strengthening its defences for any major confrontation with India.

One imagines that the spooks of the ISI thought they were being outrageously Machiavellian in their multiple dealings with terrorists they construed as freedom fighters. They would not be alone. Of course, terrorism has had a baleful impact on Pakistan itself. While from 2003 to 2008, some 13,185 Pakistanis were killed by terrorists, the figure for 2009 was 11,585, victims of 723 major incidents. The state itself has come under direct attack, including the murder of Benazir Bhutto in December 2007 and an assault on the army headquarters in Rawalpindi after the military belatedly acted against indigenous Taliban with selective rigour.

Two questions present themselves. Are enough conditions being attached to that $1 billion a year that the West disburses on Islamabad? And what contingency planning is there should the feeble, nuclear-armed, Pakistani state succumb to the incubuses its own elites have played such a deplorable role in creating?

Telegraph U.K.